CrystalDiskMark Benchmark Results
Website: CrystalDiskMark
We've chosen to drop ATTO Disk benchmark from our SSD reviews in favour of CrystalDiskMark. ATTO's highly compressible data pattern gives an unrealistic view of drive performance, and including a 'best case' benchmark for the benefit of SandForce drives is becoming less relevant as SSD partners move away from the SandForce platform.
CrystalDiskMark is similar to AS SSD in its use of incompressible data files, performing sequential, 512KB and 4KB random read and write tests. it also tests with a more realistic 32 queue-depth as opposed to AS SSD's 64 queue-depth, a load that's less relevant for a home-user.
Sequential Performance
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO mSATA 1TB
-
Toshiba THNSNH256GMCT mSATA 256GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
-
Plextor M5M mSATA 128GB
-
Crucial M500 mSATA 240GB
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO mSATA 1TB
-
Toshiba THNSNH256GMCT mSATA 256GB
-
Plextor M5M mSATA 128GB
-
Crucial M500 mSATA 240GB
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
Random Performance
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO mSATA 1TB
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
-
Plextor M5M mSATA 128GB
-
Crucial M500 mSATA 240GB
-
Toshiba THNSNH256GMCT mSATA 256GB
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
-
Crucial M500 mSATA 240GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO mSATA 1TB
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
-
Toshiba THNSNH256GMCT mSATA 256GB
-
Plextor M5M mSATA 128GB
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO mSATA 1TB
-
Toshiba THNSNH256GMCT mSATA 256GB
-
Crucial M500 mSATA 240GB
-
Plextor M5M mSATA 128GB
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 1TB
-
Samsung SSD 840 EVO mSATA 1TB
-
Plextor M5M mSATA 128GB
-
Crucial M500 mSATA 240GB
-
Toshiba THNSNH256GMCT mSATA 256GB
MB/sec, Higher Is Better
Read out
performance analysis.
Want to comment? Please log in.